<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology: Either you&#8217;re for it or against it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samjshah.com/2008/06/18/technology-either-youre-for-it-or-against-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samjshah.com/2008/06/18/technology-either-youre-for-it-or-against-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://samjshah.com/2008/06/18/technology-either-youre-for-it-or-against-it/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samjshah.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Regarding your reading of Prensky: (1) Yes, people really buy into this. (2) Yes, Prensky is, I&#039;m afraid, entirely serious. And (3) the moment you start looking for objective evidence to back up the claims of the School 2.0 people, you will come upon a gaping emptiness, because the entire School 2.0 movement is based upon anecdotal evidence and personal assumptions based on little to no data whatsoever. 

In fact, what little sociological research HAS been done on digital natives suggest that, while there may be a small (SMALL) subset of the current generation that fits Prensky&#039;s description, it&#039;s nowhere near a majority of that generation. But data doesn&#039;t seem to move a lot of these folks, only the coolness of the technology. It&#039;s wishful thinking at its pernicious worst because it causes educators to make assumptions about things that simply aren&#039;t true, and we end up not teaching kids what they need because we assume they already have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your reading of Prensky: (1) Yes, people really buy into this. (2) Yes, Prensky is, I&#8217;m afraid, entirely serious. And (3) the moment you start looking for objective evidence to back up the claims of the School 2.0 people, you will come upon a gaping emptiness, because the entire School 2.0 movement is based upon anecdotal evidence and personal assumptions based on little to no data whatsoever. </p>
<p>In fact, what little sociological research HAS been done on digital natives suggest that, while there may be a small (SMALL) subset of the current generation that fits Prensky&#8217;s description, it&#8217;s nowhere near a majority of that generation. But data doesn&#8217;t seem to move a lot of these folks, only the coolness of the technology. It&#8217;s wishful thinking at its pernicious worst because it causes educators to make assumptions about things that simply aren&#8217;t true, and we end up not teaching kids what they need because we assume they already have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samjshah</title>
		<link>http://samjshah.com/2008/06/18/technology-either-youre-for-it-or-against-it/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>samjshah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samjshah.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree. But I might have caricatured them a bit too much in my post. They were working with good faith.

Their point was definitely &quot;our kids need to learn technology because the global workforce is changing as is the nature of knowledge&quot; -- but they way they presented that point was by mocking old time teachers. 

What was so surprising was that I thought we were having a discussion on technology, so I raised my hand and said to the &quot;old&quot; teachers that I agreed with them, and I made my case for why they shouldn&#039;t adopt technology if their students were learning well. And one of the teachers broke character and said &quot;you&#039;re supposed to be on the other side.&quot;

I admit a bit of a chuckle from that. The kid in the class who says something that doesn&#039;t follow the lesson plan, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree. But I might have caricatured them a bit too much in my post. They were working with good faith.</p>
<p>Their point was definitely &#8220;our kids need to learn technology because the global workforce is changing as is the nature of knowledge&#8221; &#8212; but they way they presented that point was by mocking old time teachers. </p>
<p>What was so surprising was that I thought we were having a discussion on technology, so I raised my hand and said to the &#8220;old&#8221; teachers that I agreed with them, and I made my case for why they shouldn&#8217;t adopt technology if their students were learning well. And one of the teachers broke character and said &#8220;you&#8217;re supposed to be on the other side.&#8221;</p>
<p>I admit a bit of a chuckle from that. The kid in the class who says something that doesn&#8217;t follow the lesson plan, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlorbik</title>
		<link>http://samjshah.com/2008/06/18/technology-either-youre-for-it-or-against-it/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>vlorbik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samjshah.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-224</guid>
		<description>umm ... &quot;think&quot; for &quot;thing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm &#8230; &#8220;think&#8221; for &#8220;thing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlorbik</title>
		<link>http://samjshah.com/2008/06/18/technology-either-youre-for-it-or-against-it/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>vlorbik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samjshah.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-223</guid>
		<description>keep the faith.  literacy will survive
these high-tech cultists.  i suppose
the young *always* thing old folks 
have nothing to say to them ...
what&#039;s weird is that these guys
expect to sell that message to the old folks ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep the faith.  literacy will survive<br />
these high-tech cultists.  i suppose<br />
the young *always* thing old folks<br />
have nothing to say to them &#8230;<br />
what&#8217;s weird is that these guys<br />
expect to sell that message to the old folks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
