Polar form of Laplace’s Equation
As you might know, this summer I’m prepping for the multivariable calculus course I’m teaching next year. When going through the textbook, I’m attempting some of the “challenging” problems near the end of the section.
Today, when refreshing myself with the chain rule, I came across a problem which tested my intuition. And I’m afraid I’ve lost what little intuitive mojo I had years ago. I’m going to reproduce the problem below.
Question:
Suppose that the equation is expressed in the polar form
by making the substitution
and
.
- View
and
as functions of
and
and use implicit differentiation to show that:
- View
and
as functions of
and
and use implicit differentiation to show that:
- Use the results in parts (1) and (2) to show that:
- Use the results in part (3) to show that:
- Use the result in part (4) to show that if
satisfies Laplace’s equation
thensatisfies the equation
and conversley. The latter equation is called the polar form of Laplace’s equation.
Posted on July 31, 2008, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 10 Comments.


I think you’re making it too hard. (If it makes you feel better, I slowed down at part 3)
You’ve got x = r cos theta. Ignore the y part for now, and differentiate x & r:
dx = dr cos theta
will lead to
dx/dr = cos theta.
and if you differentiate x & theta, you get
dx = r d (cos theta) = r (- sin theta) d theta
which becomes
dx/d theta = -r sin theta.
Hi Mr. K,
I do tend to make things tougher than they need be. But I am still confused about your solution, because we need to get
dr/dx=cos(theta)
and what you get
dx/dr=cos(theta).
When you take x=r cos(theta) and say “differentiate x&r” what do you mean? Take the derivative of both sides with respect to…
Am I missing something? (Usually I am.)
Sam.
you’re right. i should have had my reading glasses on. plus, my answers didn’t make sense.
now i’m just as lost as you, if not more.
I’ve been looking at this problem for an hour or so and I can’t think of a simpler or more intuitive approach that what you came up with. Given that this is Anton you’re talking about, a solution involving solving a system of partial derivatives probably is considered “intuitive”.
Correction: I’m also trying to work through your optimization problem, which is from Anton, so I just assumed the problem in this post is Anton as well.
Carry on.
Thanks! Yup, it’s definitely from Anton.
I just figured I was missing something simple, but I’m glad I wasn’t!
r^2 = x^2 + y^2
2 r dr/dx = 2 x
2 r dr/dx = 2 r cos(theta)
dr/dx = cos(theta)
(In case the LaTeX doesn’t show, here’s a link to a web viewer: http://vclab.atp.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/software/HotEqn/HotEqn.html .)
Using the relations $\theta = \arctan(\frac{y}{x})$, $x = r \cos (\theta)$, and $y = r \sin (\theta)$, you can take the partial of $\theta$ with respect to x to get
$$ \frac{\partial\theta}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{y}{x}} \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left[ \frac{y}{x} \right] = \dots = – \frac{\sin \theta}{r}$$,
and do something similar for $ \frac{\partial\theta}{\partial y}$. This is a good problem. It got a lot of old gears turning for me.
Great blog samjshah. I’m sure it’s useful around the world.
Best, Miguel
Thank you for this. My kids do it differently each year, and it’s fun to see their approaches.
For a slightly different approach this is worth looking at: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=261217