<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statistics, used improperly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samjshah.com/2009/11/10/statistics-used-improperly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samjshah.com/2009/11/10/statistics-used-improperly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sander Huisman</title>
		<link>http://samjshah.com/2009/11/10/statistics-used-improperly/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sander Huisman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samjshah.com/?p=1635#comment-1801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the most worrying is the Kurtosis! In turbulent flows you need at least 10^4-10^5 to get statistically stationarity.

I&#039;m not sure what a harmonic and geometric mean means with marks as well ;-)

I think a Histogram and a percentage of passing would give a lot more data than all those numbers ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the most worrying is the Kurtosis! In turbulent flows you need at least 10^4-10^5 to get statistically stationarity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what a harmonic and geometric mean means with marks as well ;-)</p>
<p>I think a Histogram and a percentage of passing would give a lot more data than all those numbers ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lugo</title>
		<link>http://samjshah.com/2009/11/10/statistics-used-improperly/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Lugo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samjshah.com/?p=1635#comment-1606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oddly enough, I know who this professor was.  I seem to recall that he was just more amused by the fact that the program he used could automatically generate this stuff than anything else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, I know who this professor was.  I seem to recall that he was just more amused by the fact that the program he used could automatically generate this stuff than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

